Suchyta M, Mardini S. Innovations and future directions in head and neck microsurgical reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg. 2017;44(2):325–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2016.11.009.
Google Scholar
Tarsitano A, Battaglia S, Ciocca L, Scotti R, Cipriani R, Marchetti C. Surgical reconstruction of maxillary defects using a computer-assisted design/computer-assisted manufacturing-produced titanium mesh supporting a free flap. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016;44(9):1320–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2016.07.013.
Google Scholar
Rana M, Essig H, Eckardt AM, et al. Advances and innovations in computer-assisted head and neck oncologic surgery. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23(1):272–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e318241bac7.
Google Scholar
Poon H, Li C, Gao W, Ren H, Lim CM. Evolution of robotic systems for transoral head and neck surgery. Oral Oncol. 2018;87:82–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.10.020.
Google Scholar
Alameddine MB, Englesbe MJ, Waits SA. A video-based coaching intervention to improve surgical skill in fourth-year medical students. J Surg Educ. 2018;75(6):1475–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.04.003.
Google Scholar
Meara JG, Leather AJM, Hagander L, et al. Global surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Lancet. 2015;386(9993):569–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60160-x.
Google Scholar
Huntley RE, Ludwig DC, Dillon JK. Early effects of COVID-19 on oral and maxillofacial surgery residency training-results from a national survey. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;78(8):1257–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2020.05.026.
Google Scholar
Shah JP. The impact of COVID-19 on head and neck surgery, education, and training. Head Neck. 2020;42(6):1344–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.26188.
Google Scholar
Augestad KM, Lindsetmo RO. Overcoming distance: video-conferencing as a clinical and educational tool among surgeons. World J Surg. 2009;33(7):1356–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0036-0.
Google Scholar
Hu YY, Mazer LM, Yule SJ, et al. Complementing operating room teaching with video-based coaching. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(4):318–25. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4619.
Google Scholar
Augestad KM, Butt K, Ignjatovic D, Keller DS, Kiran R. Video-based coaching in surgical education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(2):521–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07265-0.
Google Scholar
Greenberg CC, Dombrowski J, Dimick JB. Video-based surgical coaching: an emerging approach to performance improvement. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(3):282–3. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2015.4442.
Google Scholar
Bizzotto N, Sandri A, Lavini F, Dall’Oca C, Regis D. Video in operating room: GoPro HERO3 camera on surgeon’s head to film operations–a test. Surg Innov. 2014;21(3):338–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350613513514.
Google Scholar
Matsumoto S, Sekine K, Yamazaki M, et al. Digital video recording in trauma surgery using commercially available equipment. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2013;21:27. https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-21-27.
Google Scholar
Knight H, Gajendragadkar P, Bokhari A. Wearable technology: using Google Glass as a teaching tool. BMJ Case Rep. 2015;2015:bcr2014208768. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2014-208768.
Google Scholar
Liao CH, Ooyang CH, Chen CC, et al. Video coaching improving contemporary technical and nontechnical ability in laparoscopic education. J Surg Educ. 2020;77(3):652–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.11.012.
Google Scholar
Volz S, Stevens TP, Dadiz R. A randomized controlled trial: does coaching using video during direct laryngoscopy improve residents’ success in neonatal intubations? J Perinatol. 2018;38(8):1074–80. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-018-0134-7.
Google Scholar
Giusto G, Caramello V, Comino F, Gandini M. The surgeon’s view: comparison of two digital video recording systems in veterinary surgery. J Vet Med Educ. 2015;42(2):161–5. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.0814-088R1.
Google Scholar
Silberthau KR, Chao TN, Newman JG. Innovating surgical education using video in the otolaryngology operating room. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;146(4):321–2. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2019.4862.
Google Scholar
Graves SN, Shenaq DS, Langerman AJ, Song DH. Video capture of plastic surgery procedures using the GoPro HERO 3+. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015;3(2):e312. https://doi.org/10.1097/gox.0000000000000242.
Google Scholar
Kapi E. Surgeon-manipulated live surgery video recording apparatuses: personal experience and review of literature. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2017;41(3):738–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0826-y.
Google Scholar
Kajita H, Takatsume Y, Shimizu T, Saito H, Kishi K. Overhead multiview camera system for recording open surgery. Plastic and reconstructive surgery Global open. 2020;8(4):e2765. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002765.
Google Scholar
Warrian KJ, Ashenhurst M, Gooi A, Gooi P. A novel combination point-of-view (POV) action camera recording to capture the surgical field and instrument ergonomics in oculoplastic surgery. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;31(4):321–2. https://doi.org/10.1097/iop.0000000000000465.
Google Scholar
Chaves RO, de Oliveira PAV, Rocha LC, et al. An innovative streaming video system with a point-of-view head camera transmission of surgeries to smartphones and tablets: an educational utility. Surg Innov. 2017;24(5):462–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350617715162.
Google Scholar
Wentzell D, Dort J, Gooi A, Gooi P, Warrian K. Surgeon and assistant point of view simultaneous video recording. Studies in health technology and informatics. 2019;257:489–93.
McCullough MC, Kulber L, Sammons P, Santos P, Kulber DA. Google glass for remote surgical tele-proctoring in low- and middle-income countries: a feasibility study from Mozambique. Plastic and reconstructive surgery Global open. 2018;6(12):e1999. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001999.
Google Scholar
Xiao Y, Schimpff S, Mackenzie C, et al. Video technology to advance safety in the operating room and perioperative environment. Surg Innov. 2007;14(1):52–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350607299777.
Google Scholar
Berger AJ, Gaster RS, Lee GK. Development of an affordable system for personalized video-documented surgical skill analysis for surgical residency training. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;70(4):442–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e31827e513c.
Google Scholar
Turnbull AM, Emsley ES. Video recording of ophthalmic surgery–ethical and legal considerations. Surv Ophthalmol. 2014;59(5):553–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2014.01.006.
Google Scholar
Rassweiler JJ, Teber D. Advances in laparoscopic surgery in urology. Nat Rev Urol. 2016;13(7):387–99. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2016.70.
Google Scholar
Navia A, Parada L, Urbina G, Vidal C, Morovic CG. Optimizing intraoral surgery video recording for residents’ training during the COVID-19 pandemic: Comparison of 3 point of views using a GoPro. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021;74(5):1101–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2020.10.068.
Google Scholar
Purnell CA, Alkureishi LWT, Koranda C, Patel PK. Use of a waterproof camera immersed in povidone-iodine to improve intraoperative photography. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2019;143(3):962–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000005327.
Google Scholar
Ahmed H, Devoto L. The potential of a digital twin in surgery. Surg Innov. 2021;28(4):509–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350620975896.
Google Scholar
Laaki H, Miche Y, Tammi K. Prototyping a digital twin for real time remote control over mobile networks: application of remote surgery. IEEE Access. 2019;7:20325–36. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2897018.
Google Scholar
Hope C, Reilly JJ, Griffiths G, Lund J, Humes D. The impact of COVID-19 on surgical training: a systematic review. Tech Coloproctol. 2021;25(5):505–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-020-02404-5.
Google Scholar
Ereso AQ, Garcia P, Tseng E, et al. Live transference of surgical subspecialty skills using telerobotic proctoring to remote general surgeons. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211(3):400–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.05.014.
Google Scholar
